
So at this point meera is the best option available. We have plans to develop a traditional lipi Equal Hight Font suitable for reading in mobile devices but that need resource mobilization first. In short the users and Userbase prefers Meera in First Placeī) I Know Complex stacked glyph is a problem for readability in mobile devices.
#Malayalam font firefox download
If you need examples of Govts suggestion to use of Meera Font (Traditional Orthography ) Check Their Malayalam Computing promotion website (links an old version )Īnd The download suggestion of recently launched District Administration automation project (need to validate certificate ) Meera is the default font in all Linux Distros and in the Linux distro used by State Project. To name a few check Newsportals of Dailys like 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) News channel portals like 1) 2) 3) 4) Īpart from these most of the popular Webportals Uses Traditional Lipi fonts alone and meera became most popular font. Most of the newsportals of Mainstream dailys uses Traditional Orthography Fonts (Mostly Meera). The News Papers Like Kerala Kaumudi which switched to unicode last year adopted Traditional Orthography printing using the possibility to include more glyphs via Opentype tables.Īs of Now Almost all the news portals which publish in Malayalam uses same Meera font for their websites (as and provide same in Downloads. They increased the no of characters that can include in ASCII 256 Character limit in fonts first. But even the print industry does not following this now. On pre-unicode age reformed orthography is prepared for reducing the no. It is not an official standard for Computer or Mobile use. So although there are doubtless some users who would prefer a traditional-orthography font, the evidence I see suggests that reformed is the more appropriate default, and we should switch to the Noto font (which fixes the rendering bugs mentioned in comments 1 and 3) rather than Meera. The author clearly assumes the plain text will be displayed in reformed style, otherwise the comparison would become meaningless.) (For a demonstration of point (c), see, where the traditional examples are displayed as images, while the new (reformed) ones use plain text.
#Malayalam font firefox mac
Several factors seem to point in this direction: (a) it's an official standard (even if not universally adopted) (b) the reduction in complex conjuncts and stacked forms, resulting in generally simpler glyph shapes, will tend to be more legible on a small screen and (c) the default fonts on both Windows and Mac provide the reformed orthography, and authors assume this is what they'll get unless they explicitly choose a traditional font. I notice that the Meera font implements the traditional orthography, whereas both Lohit and Noto implement reformed.įrom my (limited!) knowledge of the issues, I'm inclined to think we should probably stick with the reformed version as the default in FxOS. And the latest version is available at Īnother possibility here would be to switch from Lohit to Noto, as we have already done for a couple of other Indian languages.Ī question here - which may require broader input - is whether the default Malayalam font in FxOS should use the "traditional" or "reformed" Malayalam orthography. It is the default font for most of the mainstream malayalam websites, news portals and Gnu/Linux distributions like fedora, debian, ubuntu etc. The community prefers Meera, which is actively maintained and widely used. see the attached image for this (Rendering issue is highlighted by underlining in red color) apart from this there are rendering issues with lohit font. The default font for malayalam in FFOS is Lohit Malayalam, which is not a community preferred font because of its unpleasant aesthetics and orthographic differences from popular usage. Switch to malayalam locale or Open Any malayalam website which doesn't have webfont embedding enabled. Details User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11 Linux i686) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/.152 Safari/537.36
